2-Anything other than
urine and defecation that exits the body also nullifies. Uthaymeen explains
that this of two types, that which is Taahir and that which is deemed as being
Najis.
A-As for which is Taahir, such as sweat or tears, then this doesn’t
nullify the Wudhoo.
B-As for what is deemed as being Najis like vomit, blood or anything
other than that comes out of the two passages then this nullifies the Wudhoo if
it is a lot. A small amount is overlooked. Their evidences are from the
following:
-The Prophet [Peace and Blessings of Allaah be upon him] once vomited
and he performed Wudhoo.
-Food that has changed within the body takes the same ruling as urine or
faeces but
their exists are different. So in the case of vomit, as the exit is not from
the two passages, its ruling of impurity is lessened – thus if there is a lot
then it nullifies Wudhoo by vomiting a little doesn’t.
Another opinion, which
is the view of the Shafi’ees and another view from Imaam Ahmad, also the
favoured view of Ibn Taymiyyah is that nothing invalidates the Wudhoo except
what comes of the two passages. Their evidences:
-There is no proof for things
exiting the body as being a nullifiers of Wudhoo.
-Purification is based on evidences, and nothing can invalidate purification
except with evidences.
In response to the
evidences quoted by those who say it does nullify:
-A mere action of the Prophet
doesn’t necessarily mean that it invalidates the Wudhoo.
-Also, there is an instance where the Prophet made Hijaamah and he
didn’t repeat his Wudhoo [reported by ad-Daraqutnee (1/157) and al-Bayhaqee
(1/141) and classed as weak by Ibn Hajar in al-Talkhees (no. 152)], thus proof
that blood and vomit and the likes (anything other than the two passages)
doesn’t invalidate Wudhoo.
This is opinion is the
correct one, that anything exiting the body in other than the two passages,
doesn’t nullify the Wudhoo.
No comments:
Post a Comment