Pages

Thursday, February 05, 2015

Ar-Rudd 'ala al-Jahmiyyah (Part 2): Doubts of The Jahmiyyah in The Quraan



Imaam Ahmad in ar-Rudd ‘ala al-Jahmiyyah begins the book by explaining the doubts and contradictions of the Jahmiyyah in understanding some of the Ayaat in the Quraan.

Most if not all of these Ayaat are misinterpreted by them because of they have ignored looking at the texts holistically. Some of the Aayaat are general but they apply it with a specific meaning and visa-versa. What this means is that none of the texts can be ignored and there certainly is no contradiction within it.

1- Allaah, the Most High, Said in describing the punishment in the fire:

“As often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for other skins that they may taste the punishment.” [an-Nisaa 4:56]

The Jahmiyyah say that here is proof that Allaah can punish without bad deeds, thus proving the idea of being compelled in Qadr (Jabr) and that we lack any free-will. They also use this to prove that things happen with the Will of Allaah and that He doesn’t act based on any Hikmah. The point of evidence they bring is that the new skin of a person has not sinned and thus punished without sin.

Response: we say the Tafseer of the Aayah is clear - that their skin is recurrently being changed as form of enhanced punishment.

Also there is a principle in Usool; something that is directly connected to another (Mutasil) has the same ruling of what it is connected to and doesn’t carry a separate ruling (Munfasil). So their bodies are being punished for the sins they have incurred regardless of the type of skin attached to it.

[TN: e.g. if someone wipes over his head in Wudhoo and then shaves his hair off, does his Wudhoo become invalidated because the hair that he wiped over is no longer attached to the body? We say: that the hair that was connected to the body at the time of making Wudhoo has a Mutasil ruling and not Munfasil one.]

2- Allaah, the Most High, Said, “That will be a Day when they shall not speak (during some part of it),” [al-Mursalaat 77:35]

The Jahmiyyah  deny that Allaah Will Talk on Day of Judgment. They use this as proof to support the idea that Allaah can’t Talk. They also use this to prove the idea that humans have no free-will and are compelled, having an inability to talk.

Response: the Tafseer of this Aayah is that they will not speak in denial of any of their sins. They will be subdued and will not be in a position to debate with Allaah or present excuses for their deeds.

3- Allaa, the Most High, Says: and We shall gather them together on the Day of Resurrection on their faces, blind, dumb and deaf” [al-Israa 17: 97] but then Allaah Says: And the dwellers of the Fire will call to the dwellers of Paradise” [al-A’raaf 7:50]

They say this Aayah shows a contradiction; they will be raised blind and deaf so how will they hear the call? Therefore, not every text that talks about speech means actual speech and we must interpret it otherwise, thus denying Speech as an Attribute of Allaah (Ta’weel). It also supports the idea that Allaah has no Hikmah and that Qadr (Pre-Decree of Allaah) is compulsion.

We say in response that the Tafseer of the first Aayah describes the time when they will be resurrected; in state of deafness and blindness. However, once they enter the fire, this will be lifted from them so that they may fully experience the punishment of the fire.

Also another interpretation from the Salaf is that the people of the fire will be deaf and blind once casted into the fire, not being able or allowed to talk, only sighing and screaming. But before their entering, they will be able to call one another in a plea to be saved.

4- Allaah, the Most High, Says: Then, when the Trumpet is blown, there will be no kinship among them that Day, nor will they ask of one another” [al-Mu’minoon 23:101]

The Jahmiyyah say that there is a contradiction, here lineage is negated but in another Aayah And they will turn to one another and question one another” [as-Saffaat 37:27]. Again, we must do Ta’weel of the Quraan by ignoring and negating parts of it.

Response: after the people of the fire enter it, they will lose any connection of lineage.

Others said it means that one cannot benefit the other, no matter how close their relationship is to one another.

Others said ones concern will not be for the other.

Therefore, there is no contradiction rather it means that there is lineage but it will cease at some point.

5- The Jahmiyyah claim a contradiction in the Statement of Allaah, the Most High: “They will say: "We were not of those who used to offer their Salat (prayers)” [al-Mudatthir 77:43] and So woe unto those performers of Salat (prayers) (hypocrites)” [al-Ma’oon 107:4]

They say how can one be punished for not praying and then be cursed in another place for praying? Whether you pray or not, you will enter the fire if Allaah Wants, promoting the idea of no Hikmah and no free-will.

Response: There are many ways of entering the fire, either leaving Salaah or delaying it on purpose.

Ahl as-Sunnah affirm that those who pray whilst having at-Tawheed will not stay in the fire forever, therefore both Aayaat can be applied in a general and specific sense (Aaam and Khaas).

They argue that people will be in despair for not praying, thus ones deeds is irrelevant but Allaah will punish or reward people as He Pleases.

We say people who are in despair on the Day of Judgment for not having prayed is what they perceive for themselves. They think that they will be punished but may not be. This is similar to the word despair in the Hadeeth reported by Muslim (2812) that the “Shaytaan has despaired being worshipped in the Arabian Peninsula, so instead he plants seeds of discord between the Muslims.”

In this Hadeeth we have the same idea of despair: that Iblees has despaired of not being able to create Shirk in the land of the Arabs but doesn’t mean it will happen, because we know through other narrations that Shirk will occur.

It can also mean that his despair means that al-Islaam will not cease to exist and doesn’t mean that people will not pray or have Tawheed.

They argue the idea of being compelled and lack of free-will by saying whether on prays or not, they are liable to what Allaah wants and will be placed in the fire if He Wills.

We say in response that there is a difference in these Aayaat between delaying and deficiency and complete abandonment.

To be continued…

No comments:

Post a Comment