Pages

Thursday, August 29, 2024

Strange New Courses: An Isnad for the Athan!


Question: There is a course where the students will learn the Athan with a chain of narration going back to Bilal (may Allah be Pleased with him), have you heard of this before?

Shaykh Asim al-Quryuti (may Allah Preserve him): No, by Allah - Allah's Aid is Sought.

TN: this is a course which is being offered where people are told that they can learn to call the Athan just like the way Bilal (may Allah be Pleased with him) used to call it but the claims to have a chain of narration back to him are all lies. 

For a detailed response (in Arabic) please read the following article by Shaykh Abd al-Haqq Turkmani where the Shaykh exposes the chain to be full of unknown narrators: https://turkmani.com/articles/248








 

Tuesday, July 16, 2024

al-Jaami: He Studied Usool at-Thalatha then He Issues His Opinion on People!

 


You have only studied Usool at-Thalatha then you sit in the corner and issue rulings upon people, "Such and such person is a Taghoot", "Such and such person is a Jaahil", "Such and such person is an innovator", "The one who doesn't make Tabdee' is a Mubtadi' himself!" Fataawa that come out of the window and from the corners of the Masaajid and from houses from those who have still not studied anything whatsoever! Have mercy on the people. Rather, have mercy on yourselves. This is a mistake. 

-Shaykh Muhammad Amaan bin Ali al-Jaami (may Allah have Mercy on him), former teacher in the Prophet's Masjid in al-Madinah


Thursday, July 11, 2024

Bin Baz: It is Not Permitted for a Muslim to Hate Life

 


لا يجوز للمسلم أن يكره الحياة وييأس فيما عند الله تعالى من فرجٍ وخير، والواجب عليه أن يصبر على ما يلاقيه من أقدار الله.

فتاوى اللجنة الدائمة (25/398)

It is not permitted for a Muslim to hate life and to despair with what is with Allah (the Most High) from relief and goodness. It is obligatory upon him to be patient with what they meet from the Decrees of Allah.

Fatwaa for The Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Verdicts, 25/398

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

Q: Benefitting from the Services of Muslims


 

Question: there is a person who provides electronic services for Masjid but he provides his services for the people of Bid'ah as well as Ahl as-Sunnah. Is it permitted for us to cooperate with him?

Shaykh Sa'd bin Nasir ash-Shathri (Allah Preserve him): Permissible  

Q: Laying Flowers at the Place of an Incident


 

Question: The customs of the non-Muslims here is that if a person dies at a place of an incident, they leave flowers at the location where he died. Is it for the Muslim to act upon the customs or is this imitating non-Muslims?

Shaykh Sa'd bin Nasir ash-Shathri (Allah Preserve him): Do not do it

Q: Does Shirk have the excuse of ignorance?


Question: One of the brothers understand from your talk that if a person falls into Shirk, he never has an excuse. Is this correct?

Shaykh Sa'd bin Nasir ash-Shathri: Tawbah removes what came before it (i.e. his Tawbah will remove the sin whilst he is alive) 

Q: Is Being a Referee Haram?


Question: is being a referee in football considered as legislating by other than what Allah has revealed?

Shaykh Sa'd ash-Shathri (Allah preserve him): No

Friday, May 03, 2024

Summarised notes from the Risaalah: Ism al-Musamma of Ibn Taymiyyah

PLEASE NOTE: these are short handed notes from the book which might need further clarification to the reader but has been made available for the purpose of benefit for those who are familiar with the topic 

Taken from Vol 6 Pg. 185 onwards, Majmoo al-Fataawa of Ibn Taymiyyah (Allah have mercy on him)  

The people of Kalam say the name is not the one that is named:

Their Shubuhat:

1-Surah al-Ala, Ism and Rabb are mentioned separately

2-Lil Allah al-Asma – so Allah owns them

3-They used to worship idols and names they made up, thus showing a difference between the names and the idols

4-Huroof are created: Allah is Azali whereas us calling Him “Allah” is Haadith. Only Allah is existed so if Names and Attributes existed also this would be Shirk

5-The Lafdh “Allaah” doesn’t exist, if you look up you don’t see the words Allah but rather you will see the entity (this is a contradiction with their beliefs on Jihah)

6-The name of something is separate to the essence, if they were the same this would mean multiple essences

The stance of the people of al-Bid’ah:

1-Ism is different

2-Some made Tawaquf

Reason for this issue

-the reason why they want to seperate the Ism from the Musamma is so that Ta'teel of His Names and mainly His Attributes can then be justified. 

 Response from Ahl as-Sunnah:

1-The Usl is about Names and Attributes and Kalaam of Allah, their view goes against the way of the Salaf. We affirm and His Attributes are not created but our actions are created

Shafi and others if a person say Ism is not Musamma then realise this person is a Zindeeq

Also affirmed by Ahmad and the students of Ahmad such as al-Khallal and Kirmani

2-The creation using the names, no one uses them to refer to Allah being inside the creation

3-The belief of Ahl as-Sunnah was affirmed by the Mutaqdmin of Ahl al-Kalam, such as Ibn Fawrak and others

4-There is difference between Ism and something being referred to. So if a person is called something and referred to then the people are talking about the essence of that thing but not that the essence is present itself. Without the Ism and its relationship to the Musamma, how would a person refer or even call to them?

5-The Harf Dhu/Dhee – linguistic proof that the Ism is connected to the Musamma. Not only that He has the attribute but it is a description of the essence otherwise calling to them would be Shirk

6-The attributes can be actions and they come from the essence, otherwise they would be Shirk

7-The Ayat they have used is actually a proof against them when going back to the Tafsir

e.g. Surah al-Ala, the command from Allah to mention His name and praise Him with it. Hence its from the Adhkar of Sujood.

8-Their view goes against the use of the Arabic language and all other languages

9-The Ayat that talk about Prophets and Allah talking to them, it means Allah talked to them and their essence. E.g. “O Prophet”, “O Adam” etc.

10-The Salaf rejected their Aqidah because they wanted to say there is an essence but everything else is created, all of the Names and Attributes including the name “Allah” itself.

11-Allah existed in eternity but so did His Names and Attributes. Othewrise it would mean that Allah existed without any Names or Attributes. It would also mean that they are Haadith after, and there is nothing Haadith about Allah.

12-The people of Kalam affirm certain Names and Attributes, affirming them in Azal also. This is a contradiction from their stance

13-Without Ism being connected to Musamma, whom do we end up referring to? The Khitaab is then only Dhihni

14-If we were to differentiate between Ism and Musamma, this will create a Zaaid to the essence which doesn’t exist

e.g. Allah is Allah but not the essence, the essence is something else!?

15-It is possible for one essence to have several attributes, this doesn’t mean that they are separate essences. They are Mutardif not Mubaayan.

16-The word “ism” itself has the meaning of [Basrieen say] Samoo (something named) or [Kufiyeen say] Simaa (a signal for something). Either way, linguistics have define the Ism being placed to be part of the Musamma.

17-The people of Aqidah who have the correct Aqidah will worship Allah the most and the best, because they connect the Ism with the Musamma. So when worship Allah and call onto Him, we call on to His essence but not His Attributes but those Attributes describe the essence that we are worshipping 

And Allah Knows best